uman Powered Trails, Inc. is a non-profit organization whose mission is:  “To develop and maintain first class sustainable and environmentally correct, human-powered, shared use trails for the La Crosse, WI region."

Home News The Journal Park or housing? City weighs bluffland use
Park or housing? City weighs bluffland use PDF Print E-mail
Written by By BETSY BLOOM | bbloom@lacrossetribune.com |   
Saturday, 17 December 2011 16:41
On Thursday, December 15th the article below was written in the La Crosse Tribune.  Please review the article and be sure to read Marvin Wanders' comments at the end of the article, and then please "Show Up"!

altLa Crosse officials are considering whether 160 acres of city-owned bluffland intended to be a park would be better used for residential development.

“If there’s an opportunity to put some taxable property up there, we should really take a hard look at it,” council member Andrea Richmond said.

The Upper Hixon Forest land adjacent to the National Weather Service station on Hwy. FA now has a network of public trails, built and maintained by the trail advocacy group Human Powered Trails since 2001.

The University of Wisconsin System sold the former Experimental Farm to the city in 1963 for $38,900 with the understanding it would become a park, said Steve Carlyon, city parks and recreation director.

Carlyon doesn’t know why almost 50 years passed without that designation. Strict state laws on what can be done with park land might be a factor, he speculated, as undoing it would require court action.

He’d like to apply for grant funds to improve the site for the growing number of hikers, bikers, birders and others who use the trails.

That can’t happen unless it’s officially a park.

“It’s a great resource for this community. It’s a wonderful opportunity,” Carlyon said.

But the Common Council balked last week at designating it a park, putting off a decision for 30 days so staff can study the potential costs and returns from housing on the site.

Both the weather service and the Grandad Bluff park have wells providing water, “so it is possible,” Richmond said.

The city has much more tax-exempt property than in 1963, she noted.

“If we could use even half that land up there, we should be doing it,” Richmond said, adding a “pocket park” and trails could remain at the site.

Carlyon said he can appreciate the council wanting to consider all options. “I think they’re doing their job,” he said. “This should not be a slam dunk.”

But he believes the land is best suited to be a park and tourist attraction. Providing services likely will outweigh any tax benefit the city might see, he said.

“If it could be a subdivision, it probably would be by now,” Carlyon said.

Marvin Wanders, owner of 360 Real Estate Solutions, also questioned whether the land is suitable for development considering the steep bluff slopes.

“There’s not really that many houses you could build up there,” Wanders said.

Though a past president of Human Powered Trails, Wanders said his company pays enough in city taxes annually that “if I didn’t think park land was the best use for our citizens, I wouldn’t say that.”

He recently agreed to be the unpaid executive director of a new group to promote “silent sports” in the area. Losing the site would cut out a substantial portion of the 12-mile trail system on the bluffs, which Wanders said not only boosts regional tourism but has become part of the “quality of life” that lures professionals to La Crosse.

“I think you’re better off to continue this as a silent sports focus,” Wanders said. “You will get much more value ... better than you ever would by using this as home lots.”


It will become very important to have a large number of people present at the January council meeting to speak in favor of this becoming a park. I will let everyone know the time and date. Additionally we can provide some general talking points to help ensure we are on message.

Some general thoughts from my perspective for what it is worth. I think there are enough people on council that understand the long term value of this becoming a park and the positive impact to our community if it is forever protected. Additionally I applaud the council for delaying this 30 days as this is a forever decision. If they are doing there job as elected officials it is very important that they are looking out for the best fiduciary interest of the citizens. I happen to believe very strongly from a quality of life standpoint, a “healthy” community standpoint and economic impact standpoint that a park adds more value than does lots. The infrastructure cost alone to put water and sewer to this location would most likely make this cost prohibitive from a cost/benefit analysis. With this said, I encourage everyone to take one hour out of your lives to “show up” and “speak up” at the council meeting for this becoming a park. Additionally if your children use this land, please bring them along and encourage them to speak. It would be a great political science lesson in government. If we commit to packing the chambers with users this will be extremely difficult for the council to not approve. Additionally please place a personal call to your elected council people and the Mayors office as well, if they receive 10 calls from people who care about an issue it is a big deal. When you make the call please ask them the specific question of how they will vote! My biggest concern is not with this passing council, but the potential for the mayor to veto this becoming a park, which then makes it harder for an override and for the reality of this becoming a park which is forever protected.

Thanks,
Marvin Wanders
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment

mdotta1976 said:

79
...
Does a park designation have any impact on currently allowed NBOAs?
 
Tue - Dec 20, 11
Votes: +0

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy